Solve For K: Line Slope Equals 5/2

by Andrew McMorgan 35 views

Hey math whizzes! Today, we're diving deep into the world of coordinate geometry to tackle a problem that might seem a little daunting at first glance, but trust me, guys, it's totally manageable once you break it down. We're on a mission to find the value of kk that makes a specific line have a slope of m = rac{5}{2}. This isn't just about crunching numbers; it's about understanding the fundamental relationship between points and the slope of the line connecting them. So, grab your calculators, your trusty notebooks, and let's get this done!

Understanding the Slope Formula

Before we even think about kk, let's refresh our memory on the absolute cornerstone of this problem: the slope formula. You guys know this one: the slope (mm) between two points (x1,y1)(x_1, y_1) and (x2,y2)(x_2, y_2) is given by the change in yy divided by the change in xx. Mathematically, it's expressed as:

m=y2βˆ’y1x2βˆ’x1m = \frac{y_2 - y_1}{x_2 - x_1}

This formula is your best friend when dealing with lines and their steepness. It tells us how much the line rises (or falls) for every unit it moves horizontally. In our problem, we are given two points: (4,βˆ’3k)(4, -3k) and (2k,5)(2k, 5). We are also given the desired slope, m=52m = \frac{5}{2}. Our task is to use the slope formula with these given values and solve for the unknown kk. It's like a puzzle, and the slope formula is the key to unlocking it. We'll substitute the coordinates of our points into the formula and set it equal to the given slope. From there, it's a matter of algebraic manipulation to isolate kk. Remember, it's crucial to correctly identify which point is (x1,y1)(x_1, y_1) and which is (x2,y2)(x_2, y_2). Does it matter? Not really, as long as you are consistent. If you swap them, the signs of the numerator and denominator will both flip, and the overall slope value will remain the same. So, let's say (x1,y1)=(4,βˆ’3k)(x_1, y_1) = (4, -3k) and (x2,y2)=(2k,5)(x_2, y_2) = (2k, 5). Now we're ready to plug these into the formula and see what happens.

Plugging in the Values and Setting Up the Equation

Alright, team, let's get our hands dirty and plug those coordinates into the slope formula we just revisited. We have our points (4,βˆ’3k)(4, -3k) and (2k,5)(2k, 5), and we know the slope must be 52\frac{5}{2}. So, let's substitute:

m=y2βˆ’y1x2βˆ’x1m = \frac{y_2 - y_1}{x_2 - x_1}

rac{5}{2} = \frac{5 - (-3k)}{2k - 4}

See? We've replaced mm with 52\frac{5}{2}, y2y_2 with 55, y1y_1 with βˆ’3k-3k, x2x_2 with 2k2k, and x1x_1 with 44. Now, let's simplify the numerator:

rac{5}{2} = \frac{5 + 3k}{2k - 4}

This is our core equation, guys. It looks a bit intimidating with kk in a few places, but we're going to conquer it. The next step is to eliminate the fractions. We can do this by cross-multiplication. This is a super useful technique when you have a proportion (one fraction equal to another fraction). We multiply the numerator of the first fraction by the denominator of the second fraction, and set it equal to the product of the denominator of the first fraction and the numerator of the second fraction. So, let's do that:

5imes(2kβˆ’4)=2imes(5+3k)5 imes (2k - 4) = 2 imes (5 + 3k)

This step is crucial. It transforms our equation from a fractional mess into a simpler linear equation that we can solve for kk. Make sure you distribute carefully on both sides. It's easy to make a small arithmetic error here, so double-check your work. Remember, the goal is to isolate kk, and setting up this cross-multiplied equation is a massive step in the right direction. We're turning a problem about slopes and points into a standard algebra problem. How cool is that? Keep your eyes on the prize, which is that single value of kk that satisfies the condition.

Solving for k: The Algebraic Journey

Now that we've got our equation set up without fractions, it's time for the real algebra magic to happen. We need to solve for kk using our equation from the cross-multiplication step:

5(2kβˆ’4)=2(5+3k)5(2k - 4) = 2(5 + 3k)

First, let's distribute the numbers on both sides of the equation. This means multiplying each term inside the parentheses by the number outside:

10kβˆ’20=10+6k10k - 20 = 10 + 6k

Great! Now we have a linear equation with kk terms on both sides and constant terms on both sides. Our goal is to get all the kk terms on one side and all the constant terms on the other. It doesn't matter which side you choose for kk, but it's often convenient to move the term with the smaller coefficient to avoid negative coefficients, if possible. Let's subtract 6k6k from both sides:

10kβˆ’6kβˆ’20=10+6kβˆ’6k10k - 6k - 20 = 10 + 6k - 6k

4kβˆ’20=104k - 20 = 10

See? We're getting closer! Now, let's move the constant term (βˆ’20-20) to the right side by adding 2020 to both sides:

4kβˆ’20+20=10+204k - 20 + 20 = 10 + 20

4k=304k = 30

Almost there! The final step to isolate kk is to divide both sides by the coefficient of kk, which is 44:

4k4=304\frac{4k}{4} = \frac{30}{4}

k=304k = \frac{30}{4}

We can simplify this fraction by dividing both the numerator and the denominator by their greatest common divisor, which is 22:

k=152k = \frac{15}{2}

And there you have it, guys! We have successfully found the value of kk. This value, k=152k = \frac{15}{2}, is the key that makes the line passing through (4,βˆ’3k)(4, -3k) and (2k,5)(2k, 5) have the specific slope of 52\frac{5}{2}. It's a testament to the power of the slope formula and basic algebraic manipulation. We took an equation with two unknowns (the points' coordinates involving kk and the slope) and solved for the specific value of kk that fits the criteria. It's a fantastic example of how mathematical concepts interrelate and how solving one problem can open the door to understanding others. Keep practicing these types of problems, and you'll be a coordinate geometry pro in no time!

Verification: Does Our kk Work?

Okay, so we've done the math and found k=152k = \frac{15}{2}. But in math, especially when you've been working hard, it's always a solid move to verify your answer. Let's plug this value of kk back into our original points and see if the slope really does come out to 52\frac{5}{2}. This is where we can be absolutely sure we've got it right. No more guessing, just pure confirmation.

Our original points were (4,βˆ’3k)(4, -3k) and (2k,5)(2k, 5). Let's substitute k=152k = \frac{15}{2} into these points:

First point: (4,βˆ’3k)=(4,βˆ’3imes152)=(4,βˆ’452)(4, -3k) = (4, -3 imes \frac{15}{2}) = (4, -\frac{45}{2})

Second point: (2k,5)=(2imes152,5)=(15,5)(2k, 5) = (2 imes \frac{15}{2}, 5) = (15, 5)

So, our two points are now (4,βˆ’452)(4, -\frac{45}{2}) and (15,5)(15, 5). Let's use the slope formula again with these concrete values:

m=y2βˆ’y1x2βˆ’x1m = \frac{y_2 - y_1}{x_2 - x_1}

Let (x1,y1)=(4,βˆ’452)(x_1, y_1) = (4, -\frac{45}{2}) and (x2,y2)=(15,5)(x_2, y_2) = (15, 5).

m=5βˆ’(βˆ’452)15βˆ’4m = \frac{5 - (-\frac{45}{2})}{15 - 4}

Now, let's simplify the numerator and the denominator:

Numerator: 5βˆ’(βˆ’452)=5+4525 - (-\frac{45}{2}) = 5 + \frac{45}{2}. To add these, we need a common denominator. 5=1025 = \frac{10}{2}. So, 102+452=552\frac{10}{2} + \frac{45}{2} = \frac{55}{2}.

Denominator: 15βˆ’4=1115 - 4 = 11.

So, the slope is:

m=55211m = \frac{\frac{55}{2}}{11}

To divide a fraction by a whole number, we can multiply the fraction by the reciprocal of the whole number. The reciprocal of 1111 is 111\frac{1}{11}.

m=552imes111m = \frac{55}{2} imes \frac{1}{11}

m=5522m = \frac{55}{22}

Now, we can simplify this fraction. Both 5555 and 2222 are divisible by 1111:

m=55Γ·1122Γ·11=52m = \frac{55 \div 11}{22 \div 11} = \frac{5}{2}

Boom! Just like that, we've confirmed that our calculated value of k=152k = \frac{15}{2} results in a slope of exactly 52\frac{5}{2}. This verification step is super important, guys. It builds confidence in your answers and helps you catch any potential mistakes. If we hadn't gotten 52\frac{5}{2}, we would go back and re-check our algebra. But since we did, we know we've successfully found the value of kk that satisfies the given condition. It's a great feeling to know your work is solid, right? This process of solving and then verifying is a fundamental part of mathematical problem-solving and is a skill that will serve you well in all your studies.

Conclusion: Mastering the Slope

So, there you have it, math adventurers! We successfully navigated the journey of finding the value of kk for a line with a specific slope. We started by understanding the fundamental slope formula, which is absolutely essential for any problems involving lines and points. Then, we carefully plugged in the given coordinates and the target slope, setting up an equation that allowed us to use the power of cross-multiplication to eliminate fractions. The subsequent algebraic steps, involving distribution and isolating the variable kk, led us to our solution. Finally, and crucially, we verified our answer by plugging the calculated kk value back into the original points and recalculating the slope. This confirmation step is key to ensuring accuracy and building confidence in our mathematical abilities.

This problem, while seemingly simple, touches upon several core mathematical principles: the definition of slope, algebraic manipulation, and the importance of verification. By mastering these concepts, you're building a strong foundation for tackling more complex problems in geometry, algebra, and beyond. Remember, guys, every problem you solve, especially those involving finding the value of kk or other variables, is a step forward in your mathematical journey. Don't be afraid to practice, don't be afraid to make mistakes (because that's how we learn!), and always strive to understand the 'why' behind the 'how'. Keep that curiosity alive, and you'll continue to discover the beauty and logic of mathematics. Happy problem-solving!